Top Ten Tuesday is a weekly meme created by The Broke and the Bookish. This week the theme is romance types and tropes.
I do read romances but I need them a particular way and I can’t define it. I just know from the first page whether or not we’ll work as a couple. If I’m cringing or grimacing at the first sentence then that romance is not for me. If it makes me laugh or intrigues me then, yes, I want a second date and possibly a long-term commitment after that.
One. “I’m looking for a mind at work.”
I normally don’t reference Hamilton when blogging but this quote seems so relevant in this moment. I want to know the writer put some thought (and heart!) into what they’re writing. I’m definitely not looking for a paint by numbers or mad lib to pass the time. I want my mind and heart to engage with the material. If the author didn’t put in the effort, it shows.
Two. I like historical romance, heavy on the historical.
Three. No Jane Austen knock-offs. They can be inspired by her, I have no problem with that. (Gail Carriger is clearly inspired by Jane Austen but she decidedly has her own unique style and voice.) If a writer doesn’t have their own style it’s obvious, like a bad cover of a great song. Jane Austen knock-offs are guaranteed to make me cringe.
Four. I like romantic comedies because they’ve got comedy.
Five. I like the cuter side of yaoi. That super-explicit stuff is not my jam and bread.
Six. I really like making fun of the romantic wackiness that is Fushigi Yugi.
Seven. My favorite fantasy series have romances I actively root for.
Eight. I tend to ignore descriptions of the leading men. In my head they look how I want them to look. (For instance, Lucivar is blonde in my head even though Anne Bishop keeps telling me he has long black hair.)
Nine. I don’t pick actors to represent the characters in the books I’m reading (but when I’m writing I will think of actors who should play my characters).
Ten. I’m not automatically turned-off by insta-love in books.